ALERT
This has evolved from a boyhood dream into a full time obsession. While I mainly work for family. I do all sorts of stuff, but mainly keeping Peace and Nonviolence at the top of my priorities is my life long ambition, in the name of my great great grandfather on the Cuban $100 bill, Francisco Vicente Aguilera.
I’ve started raising a pair of Vieled Chameleons from Saudi Arabia recently. I don’t like snakes but I’ve kept many species of reptiles as pets from common to rare, and everything inbetween. I have begun my own private collection from which I will produce offspring, and work with select importers to obtain only the best in wild caught, hard to find Reptiles.
It’s going to be fun breeding these magnificent animals. The best thing is that I won’t sell what I wouldn’t buy, and I’ll stand firm behind that. In the early days I worked with the C, D, & F grade animals and did what I could with them. Cost was a factor back then, but not so much anymore. I experienced and learned a wealth of knowledge by keeping, caring, and treating those animals. When the time comes, I will strive to find the best for my customers, as I would expect any seller that I would buy from to do the same. And I will make the time to always be available for any questions or inquiries, whether customer or not. For that, visit uRSVP.com, where you can reserve yours in advance. It’s another WordPress format, so we can cross-promote/network if anyone would desire so!
Thanks for your time!
Jews are a famously accomplished group. They make up 0.2 percent of the world population, but 54 percent of the world chess champions, 27 percent of the Nobel physics laureates and 31 percent of the medicine laureates.
Jews make up 2 percent of the U.S. population, but 21 percent of the Ivy League student bodies, 26 percent of the Kennedy Center honorees, 37 percent of the Academy Award-winning directors, 38 percent of those on a recent Business Week list of leading philanthropists, 51 percent of the Pulitzer Prize winners for nonfiction.
In his book, “The Golden Age of Jewish Achievement,” Steven L. Pease lists some of the explanations people have given for this record of achievement. The Jewish faith encourages a belief in progress and personal accountability. It is learning-based, not rite-based.
Most Jews gave up or were forced to give up farming in the Middle Ages; their descendants have been living off of their wits ever since. They have often migrated, with a migrant’s ambition and drive. They have congregated around global crossroads and have benefited from the creative tension endemic in such places.
No single explanation can account for the record of Jewish achievement. The odd thing is that Israel has not traditionally been strongest where the Jews in the Diaspora were strongest. Instead of research and commerce, Israelis were forced to devote their energies to fighting and politics.
Milton Friedman used to joke that Israel disproved every Jewish stereotype. People used to think Jews were good cooks, good economic managers and bad soldiers; Israel proved them wrong.
But that has changed. Benjamin Netanyahu’s economic reforms, the arrival of a million Russian immigrants and the stagnation of the peace process have produced a historic shift. The most resourceful Israelis are going into technology and commerce, not politics. This has had a desultory effect on the nation’s public life, but an invigorating one on its economy.
Tel Aviv has become one of the world’s foremost entrepreneurial hot spots. Israel has more high-tech start-ups per capita than any other nation on earth, by far. It leads the world in civilian research-and-development spending per capita. It ranks second behind the U.S. in the number of companies listed on the Nasdaq. Israel, with seven million people, attracts as much venture capital as France and Germany combined.
As Dan Senor and Saul Singer write in “Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle,” Israel now has a classic innovation cluster, a place where tech obsessives work in close proximity and feed off each other’s ideas.
Because of the strength of the economy, Israel has weathered the global recession reasonably well. The government did not have to bail out its banks or set off an explosion in short-term spending. Instead, it used the crisis to solidify the economy’s long-term future by investing in research and development and infrastructure, raising some consumption taxes, promising to cut other taxes in the medium to long term. Analysts at Barclays write that Israel is “the strongest recovery story” in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
Israel’s technological success is the fruition of the Zionist dream. The country was not founded so stray settlers could sit among thousands of angry Palestinians in Hebron. It was founded so Jews would have a safe place to come together and create things for the world.
This shift in the Israeli identity has long-term implications. Netanyahu preaches the optimistic view: that Israel will become the Hong Kong of the Middle East, with economic benefits spilling over into the Arab world. And, in fact, there are strands of evidence to support that view in places like the West Bank and Jordan.
But it’s more likely that Israel’s economic leap forward will widen the gap between it and its neighbors. All the countries in the region talk about encouraging innovation. Some oil-rich states spend billions trying to build science centers. But places like Silicon Valley and Tel Aviv are created by a confluence of cultural forces, not money. The surrounding nations do not have the tradition of free intellectual exchange and technical creativity.
For example, between 1980 and 2000, Egyptians registered 77 patents in the U.S. Saudis registered 171. Israelis registered 7,652.
The tech boom also creates a new vulnerability. As Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic has argued, these innovators are the most mobile people on earth. To destroy Israel’s economy, Iran doesn’t actually have to lob a nuclear weapon into the country. It just has to foment enough instability so the entrepreneurs decide they had better move to Palo Alto, where many of them already have contacts and homes. American Jews used to keep a foothold in Israel in case things got bad here. Now Israelis keep a foothold in the U.S.
During a decade of grim foreboding, Israel has become an astonishing success story, but also a highly mobile one.
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: January 11, 2010
A version of this article appeared in print on January 12, 2010, on page A23 of the New York edition.
By MARGIE MASON, AP Medical Writer – Thu Nov 19, 3:01 pm ET
AP – FILE -This Dec. 7, 2008 file photo shows children collecting stagnant water for use at home in Glen View, …
HANOI, Vietnam – Diarrhea doesn’t make headlines. Nor does pneumonia. AIDS and malaria tend to get most of the attention.
Yet even though cheap tools could prevent and cure both diseases, they kill an estimated 3.5 million kids under 5 each a year globally — more than HIV and malaria combined.
“They have been neglected, because donor or partnership mechanisms shifted their emphasis to HIV and AIDS and other issues,” said Dr. Tesfaye Shiferaw, a UNICEF official in Africa. “These age-old traditional killers remain with us. The ones dying are the children of the poor.”
Global spending on maternal, newborn and child health was about $3.5 billion in 2006, according to a report by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. That same year, nearly $9 billion was devoted to HIV and AIDS, according to UNAIDS.
Pneumonia is the biggest killer of children under 5, claiming more then 2 million lives annually or about 20 percent of all child deaths. AIDS, in contrast, accounts for about 2 percent.
If identified early, pneumonia can be treated with inexpensive antibiotics. Yet UNICEF and the World Health Organization estimate less than 20 percent of those sickened receive the drugs.
A vaccine has been available since 2000 but has not yet reached many children in developing countries. The GAVI Alliance, a global partnership, hopes to introduce it to 42 countries by 2015.
Diarrheal diseases, such as cholera and rotavirus, kill 1.5 million kids each year, most under 2 years old. The children die from dehydration, weakened immune systems and malnutrition. Often they get sick from drinking dirty water.
The worst cholera outbreak to hit Africa in 15 years killed more than 4,000 people in Zimbabwe last year. The country recently reported new cases of the waterborne disease, and more are expected as the rainy season peaks and sewers overflow.
Rotavirus, a highly contagious disease spread through contaminated hands and surfaces, is the top cause of severe diarrhea, accounting for more than a half million child deaths a year.
A vaccine routinely given to children in the U.S. and Europe is expected to reach 44 poorer countries by 2015 through the GAVI Alliance.
“Every child in the United States gets it, even though they have access to clean water and hygiene,” said John Wecker, of the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, a Seattle-based nonprofit that is part of the vaccine alliance. “The only effective way to prevent these deaths is through vaccination.”
Diarrheal diseases received more attention in the 1980s and 1990s, he said, but interest has waned or been diverted elsewhere, allowing them to creep back.
“How did the leading killers end up at the bottom of the global health agenda? I don’t know,” Wecker said at a recent GAVI meeting in Hanoi. “We’ve got the tools. We’re not looking for the next technological breakthrough. It’s here now and it’s not being used.”
Death can often be prevented by giving children fluid replacement, a simple recipe of salt and sugar mixed with clean water to help ward off dehydration. Yet 60 percent of children with diarrhea never receive the concoction, according to a WHO and UNICEF report released last month.
“It is so preventable,” said Dr. Richard Cash, a Harvard University expert who helped develop the oral rehydration therapy 40 years ago. “Preventing the deaths is at the very least what we should be striving for.”
The Taliban has been accused of having child soldiers in its ranks
November 16, 2008
By Mirjana Rakela
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child categorically prohibits involving children in war operations. But despite international conventions, minors continue to be used as soldiers in military conflicts around the world. Europe is no exception — thousands of child soldiers fought during the Balkan wars between 1991 and 1995. Mirjana Rakela, from RFE/RL’s South Slavic and Albanian-Languages Service, received the Lorenzo Natali Prize on November 15 for her reports on child soldiers, first broadcast in November 2007.
An estimated 300,000 children are currently involved in 33 armed conflicts around the world. Nongovernmental organizations say about 100,000 of them live in Africa.
They are usually between 14 and 18 years of age, although child soldiers as young as nine are not rare.
Some are volunteers, but the vast majority of them were forcefully recruited into paramilitary and military units. They took up arms in order to survive after family, social, and economic breakdowns, often after seeing their families tortured or killed by the regime’s soldiers or armed groups.
Girls are not spared either. In El Salvador, Ethiopia, and Uganda, almost a third of little soldiers are girls.
Increasingly modern, user-friendly military technology and weapons have made it easier for armed groups to misuse children and turn them into warriors.
Once recruited, children can be used as cooks, suppliers, or guards. But more often than not, they are sent to the front line of combat, to patrol mine fields, and even on suicide missions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.
Enrique Restoy, of the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, says children have fought in all known conflicts in the Middle East. He has personally met many child soldiers from regions such as the Palestinian territories, Lebanon, or Sudan.
Children, he says, suffer the after-effects of war, even when they try to hide them — war memories don’t fade overnight, especially if these children have committed crimes.
Support programs for these children, however, are generally quick and rarely focus on long-term education and social reinsertion.
Easily Manipulated
Restoy says some children are actually proud to have served in armed groups that combated forces occupying their country.
“Children in Iraq and the Palestinian territories live surrounded by violence — on one side there are armed groups, on the other the occupying army,” Restoy said. “They face violence almost daily and unfortunately they have access to weapons. It’s true that in some countries, like Yemen, weapons are part of the culture and very young children carry weapons as a symbol of their family’s importance and prestige.
“But children are easily manipulated, and this is why we want to prohibit any kind of involvement of children in armed conflicts. They are not mature enough to decide whether or not they want, and should, belong to an armed group. Armed groups or the army recruiting them manipulate them without difficulty. And regardless of whether the children voluntarily join these groups or live in a region under occupation, there’s always a crime committed by their recruiters and a manipulation committed by their recruiters.”
Diar Bamri, a correspondent for RFE/RL’s Iraqi Service, says media reports and international organizations confirm that terrorist groups in Iraq use children as militants.
The “Los Angeles Times” for instance, citing U.S. sources, reported in 2007 that some 800 children suspected of carrying out terrorist attacks were jailed in U.S. prisons in Iraq, some as young as 11 years old.
Poverty is a key factor pushing children to enroll as fighters.
“I think one of the reasons is money. Many come from very poor families, they have lost their fathers and brothers. These families need money because they don’t have any regular income. They ask children to go out on the streets and bring money home, they don’t ask where this money comes from,” Bamri says.
“They tell them to drop out of school because the time is for survival, not education. On the streets, children become easy prey for terrorists and organized groups that recruit them. A child can go anywhere without being stopped by soldiers and policemen, so unfortunately they can carry out any kind of attack.
“Such children do not differ from other children on the street, and there are many thousands of them wandering around Iraqi cities. Who can determine whether a child is good or bad, whether or not he is a terrorist? When you speak to these boys, they tell you: ‘I was manipulated, used, forced because our family is very poor.’ Terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda pay these children up to $300 a month. By comparison, an average Iraqi family today survives on $100 to $150 a month. That’s why these children are ready to do anything for money.”
State Of Fear
The testimonials published by Human Rights Watch are shocking. Emilio, recruited into the Guatemalan army when he was 14 years old, recalls how child soldiers were constantly beaten up into a state of permanent fear. They were more often hungry than sated, they had to carry heavy armament. They were taught to fight against enemies in a war they didn’t understand.
Susan, a 16-year-old from Uganda, tells the story of a boy from her village who tried to escape after being abducted and recruited into the Lord’s Resistance Army. He was captured, and the other children were forced to beat him to death with hoes. After they had killed him, they were ordered to smear their own hands with his blood, to overcome their fear of death and dissuade them from escaping.
Following the latest wave of violence in Burma, Human Rights Watch published a report detailing how the military regime in this Asian country recruits children into their armed forces.
Jo Becka, who works at Human Rights Watch’s New York headquarters, says the Burmese army is recruiting thousands of children into its forces.
“The army is constantly increasing its number of battalions, but at the same time there are more and more deserters. The armed forces have trouble meeting recruitment quotas, so they realized that children make an easy target. They approach them on the street, in public places, and force them to join the army,” Becka says.
“Children have told us that they are beaten when they are not able to endure military drills. They frequently try to escape, but when they are captured and taken back to the recruitment center, they are beaten by their colleagues. In some cases they are severely injured, some even die. We spoke to about 20 former soldiers. The majority of them were recruited when they were 10 years old.
“Three of the former soldiers we spoke to were recruited twice. One of them was first recruited when he was 14 years old. He managed to escape the following year, but he was captured. When his grandmother and aunt realized that he was back in the army, they traveled to his unit and asked the commander to release him. The man said: ‘I will let him go, but only if you bring me five other recruits in exchange.’ When the boy found this out, he told his aunt: ‘Don’t do that, don’t bring five other people. Life here is terrible and I have to face it myself.’ Afterwards, he started voluntarily signing up for the most dangerous assignments. What he said to us was: “In the army, my life was worthless.’”
The director of RFE/RL’s North Caucasus Service, Aslan Doukaev, says there is no precise figure for the number of child fighters in the region. But rights groups say a great number of minors are definitely involved in fighting in the North Caucasus.
“I saw with my own eyes how a boy who was 13 or 14 at most grabbed a gun from a Russian paramilitary soldier in the center of Grozny, on a marketplace, and killed him. Children try to get hold of weapons in order to join military groups,” Doukaev says.
“I also know that some of them are real experts in planting mines and traps. But there is no organized campaign to recruit children. This often happens spontaneously. Some children don’t have parents, others come from poor or destroyed families, and joining militant fighters makes them feel important and significant. Schools are either closed or function poorly, kids have nowhere to go. They have a choice between staying at home and risking being arrested, exposed to violence and drugs; or join one of the military groups. Very often, they choose the second option.”
The number of children fighting in Afghanistan is not known either; international organizations say the Taliban and Al-Qaeda have thousands of boys in their ranks. Their number has been declining in recent years. But Mohammad Amin Mudaqiq, the director of RFE/RL’s Kabul bureau, says the insurgents are still recruiting children.
“The Talibans usually enroll teenagers, children aged 13 to 14. Some are even younger, but they prepare all of them equally for suicide missions. Al-Qaeda and the Talibans take advantage of the fact that high-ranking state officials are usually happy to meet children. Children are easily brainwashed and led to believe that after the suicide attack, they will go to heaven,” Mudaqiq says.
“We know of a boy who was recruited as a suicide bomber but then changed his mind and decided to surrender to authorities. He called his father from Pakistan to ask him for forgiveness, and the father forgave him publicly. A child was used as a human shield in a recent suicide attack in Baghlan that killed around 80 people. The bomber walked behind the child, who approached a member of parliament with a bunch of flowers. Security forces let the child and the older person through, and when they were close to the deputy the suicide bomber detonated the explosive. Insurgents recently also used students from the madrasah in order to approach NATO soldiers in Kabul and attack them. NATO soldiers fired in retaliation, and 12 children died.”
European Problem
In Europe, too, children have been draw into armed conflicts — the 1990s Balkan wars are the most recent example.
The UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child was largely ignored during the war years, and scores of children died in the fighting. The war prompted the European Union in 2003 to adopt guidelines concerning children affected by armed conflicts.
The European Parliament drafted a resolution aimed at curbing the recruitment and use of children in armed conflicts. Such a document would give the European Parliament more leverage on governments, but also international bodies such as the United Nations, when calling for more measures against the use of children in armed conflicts.
One of the driving force behind the resolution was Britain’s Sharon Bowles, a member of the European Parliament. Using children as soldiers, she says, is a new form of slavery.
“Quite often they are given drugs and put in the front line, their childish innocence and unpredictable behavior are used as a weapon in war. We want as many people as possible to be aware of the existence of child warriors and to have as many states as possible take part in the action, in order for the Convention on the Rights of the Child to be truly respected,” Bowles says.
“I would like to emphasize that the use of children as soldiers is a new form of slavery. This is a type of forced labor in horrifying conditions. This is the worst possible form of slavery. Our goal is to have countries of the West, big nations, such as the United States or Russia, exert real political pressure on countries where this is taking place. This is part of today’s reality, but we have to be active in preventing it as much as possible and applying diplomatic pressure.”
Admin: “Is this sad or what???”
Jewry is the international albatross now hung around the neck of the world. What glorious destiny might have been ours without it. What we might have earned, what we might have discovered, what we might have accomplished without its enervating and meddling weight. But the weight remains; the expeditors of decline are running the store. Like a woman who spurns her man because he has no self-respect, we too have been spurned. The lives of our youth have been declared second-rate by those whose instruction books guide them in the ways of an alchemy-like supremacy. This supremacy turns civilizations not into the comely sparkle of gold, but to a termite-riddled rubble, a decaying mass of flotsam and jetsam.
The Jew of the World has made it clear, at least to his own brethren, that his allegiances to his host country have long since been frayed. His belief in nothing other than his own egotism now animates his breezily insouciant pursuit of a worldly kingdom of limitless treasure and corporate dominion. He now operates openly and unapologetically, yet still cobbles together a template of pseudo-intellectual respectability to cover his tracks.
My friends, it is time to rip the falsely pious front off of Jewry’s activities and expose their deeds to the light of day. The international Jews’ “light unto the nations” balderdash does not equal, in any shape or form, a candle of humble illumination. It is instead equivalent to the bare and ugly bulb that lights an interrogation room populated by Jewish “hate crime” bureaucrats and thought-control apparatchiks. This “light” is not a pleasant glow feeding the intellectual health of a jejune populace, but a raging and unquenchable fire burning our institutions to the ground. Was it not the Jew of the World who encouraged youthful rabble to “bring it all down, man”? Was it not this albatross, these very internationalists who cheered Communist ideologue Antonio Gramsci’s “long march through the institutions”? If our institutions are now not literally turned to cinders, then they are remodeled, restructured and realigned ideologically, so that they provide comfort, ease, accolades and succor to the Jew of the World. After all, he is fond of crowing about all those Jewish Nobel Prize winners, isn’t he?
The Jew of the World is quintessentially an internationalist. To this caliber of Jew, the health of his home country or its citizens is not of paramount concern. However, the health of the other Jews of the World is his be-all and end-all, his raison d’etre, the warm reassuring tribalism that has become his trademark. Their comfort is the end game. How does this type of Jew ensure the comfort of his fellow tribesmen?
That’s easy. He works to draw as little attention to himself and his brethren as possible. The only recognition Jews receive as Jews should be either as innocent victims who have fallen prey to non-Jewish perfidy or as humanitarians and activists supposedly working for the rights of all people. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a Masonic secret society of racialist Jews, concocts and frames all of their political activities to confirm this false impression amongst the public, whether they are doing “outreach work” aimed at blacks, Hispanics, Muslims or gaggles of worshipfully genuflecting Zionized Christian believers who bend the knee at the altar of Israel. In the minds of an unthinking and suggestible citizenry, Jewish machinations appear as altruism rather than as what they really are: crudely advantageous in-groupism.
Hence, Jewish-owned media outlets are proud to mention Jewish inventors, scientists, philosophers, doctors, authors and intellectuals, but fall silent when history reveals the preponderance of Jews involved in organized crime, loan-sharking, usury, unsavory business dealings, pornography, organ trafficking, sex slavery and terrorism. Any media slide show of Jewish history is rife with images of enlightenment, achievement and progress. Dozens of books celebrate a “Jewish Century.” Public television gushes about the Jewish role in the creation of the popular standard. Documentaries wax nostalgic about Jewish freedom riders who braved nightsticks and fire hoses selflessly as they helped blacks register to vote in the South even as they cheered on the segregated housing and Jews-only settlements in the Zionist state which practices government-sanctioned oppression funded by working Americans.
But there are no images conveying the human degradation, bondage and the lowering of the human spirit that the Jew of the World has brought to all peoples and lands with his activities, which would be looked on as shameful if perpetrated by any other tribe. No, Jewish “reality” is a break-neck cavalcade of dishonest and often discordant propaganda masquerading as truth, as empirical fact and as a desire for peace and tranquility. It is balderdash. In reality it is nothing more than bones and thin gruel fed to the non-Jewish world whose citizens are dim-witted enough to worship the very usurpers of their destiny and their heritage. But one will find it almost impossible to convince the non-Jew that the Jewish internationalist literally markets in lies as a means of making a living out of a killing. He is a lie-vendor and a truth-bender.
The Jew of the World’s media cannot help but be dishonest because its views derive from the character of the internationalist Diaspora’s tribalist mentality that circles the wagons when necessary and protects the in-group at all costs. Protection of the Jew requires lies. The tribalist Jew can only survive in a mish-mash of warring races, ethnicities and religions and a plethora of falsehoods which attempt to convince the host how wonderful the whole wretched arrangement really is. This is why multiculturalism is heralded, come what might, while what Kevin MacDonald calls “racial Zionism” is given cover and protection by the AP. And the Jew plays the profiting middle-man as the structures crumble and he protects his heritage come what may.
The media tries hard to magnify the Big Lie, the glossy image of Jews as a uniquely sensitive group of busy bee social workers striving to make our world a better place for everyone. However, Israel is the low-brow national embodiment of the true character of the Jew of the World. Israel’s “hideous strength” comes from the built-in advantages of a scruple-free environment that scorns honest labor of any sort. Mix this scruple-free “blood Jew” dystopia with inverted Nuremberg laws and a few hundred nuclear warheads and you will realize how and why the Jew appears so ugly to the rest of the planet. Of course, this animus by non-Jews only spurs the Zionist project forward, completely tone-deaf and hungering after bedlam and theft. In the present day, this tiny nation begins to look like a cartoon version of an autocracy springing from the mind of Stanley Kubrick. Israel is the man with a Napoleon complex basking in the stature which his newly purchased elevator shoes provide him. It’s both silly and deadly serious. It flows with blood and reeks of supremacy and colonialism. Yet the Jew of the World is not ashamed. Au contraire; he is proud.
Despite his countless excesses that splash across the planet’s purview, the worldly Jew clings to his own “racial” and ethnic feelings and churlishly demands that everyone else relinquish theirs. Yet this Jew never provides a reason why racial pride, identity and solidarity should be jettisoned. He instead invents or embellishes a laundry list of sundry historical crimes which he keeps in a kosher tome-like dossier. He then pins these “crimes” on this or that group when he feels the need to engage in pseudo-polemics or simply crude personal invective and slander. He gags his opponents (which are almost everyone ranging from white nationalists to black nationalists) with these tactics. He is an expert in the ways of espionage and playing the mole, and even the defector when it suits his agenda. He is two-faced and both of them are hideous and duplicitous. The pugilistic Dick Morris is a prime example of this brand of Jewish opportunism and selective faux moral outrage.
Paranoia fuels the worldly Jew’s suspicions, but so too does guilt. The Jew of the World is the stereotypical self-hater. Any Jew possessing just a modicum of a conscience (and some possess none) would have to feel guilt for what his brethren have wrought upon our globe. Yet, the teachings of his childhood cause his brain to attempt to do two contradictory things at the same time. An overweening mother, as well as sustained in-breeding has probably created a series of neuroses which are irreversible. All of these quirks elicit his self-loathing, but here lies the rub. This self-loathing then becomes juxtaposed with an almost insufferable chutzpah and arrogance that derives from the Jewish religion and the supremacist ideas which have been passed down from generation to generation. This Jew, not able to fully imbibe his self-hatred after being reassured constantly of his own “specialness”, “Chosenness” and unique intellectual superiority, instead turns his hatred outward and unleashes it onto the non-Jewish world. This is why the hatred emanating from the Jew of the World seems so disproportionate and vitriolic when it is finally set loose upon our culture. To the non-Jew, this is completely out of the realm of his comprehension. He cannot imagine that someone could loathe him with such an unfathomable intensity. Al Goldstein is the perfect prototype of this Jew. He is so full of self-hatred that he refers to himself as a “dirty kike”, but he hates non-Jewish culture, including Catholicism and Christ far more. This self-hating Jew sees himself as an agent of our destruction. He hates everything that surrounds himself, including himself. Hence, all must be morphed into the ugliness that is the internationalist Diaspora tribalist. What is on his mind must be mainstreamed. To do otherwise might make him uncomfortable.
The Jew of the World, left to his own devices, succored on racial Zionism, the constant need for the upper hand, and sporting an ancient blueprint for destruction and the bankroll to carry it off, will progress where he always progresses. This is the path of the perpetual scam and it is followed as only the Jew can follow it. European-American activist and behavioral neuroscientist Steven E. Romer has correctly described the internationalist Jews as “natural-born mimics, actors, deception artists and scam addicts.” This succinct and unapologetic description could not be more dead-on accurate. The Jew of the World is a consummate actor, a chameleon who has a frighteningly adroit way of hiding his “Otherness”, his alien and subversive character from his host.
In fact, the Method form of acting was created entirely by Jews. It was crafted first by Constanin Stanislavski. His teachings instructed the actor to analyze a character’s emotions and motivations so that he could embody them in a realistic way on the stage. Acting teacher Lee Strasberg later built upon the foundation of Stanislavski’s ground-breaking Method, ultimately influencing many of our most famous and acclaimed actors. Jews Stella Adler and Sanford Meisner also added their own insights to the Method that Strasberg had devoted his life to teaching.
The Jews know what we Europeans, the progenitors of drama have recently forgotten. The Jew understands that the wielding of drama as a weapon to shape “ways of seeing” and the use of the “passion play” to engender non-in group sympathy and to sow confusion and division in the majority culture guarantees his primacy. His mimicry, his unabashed, but still concealed chameleonism has permitted him to sell tribalism as universalism. Hence, he has dropped below the radar of the average mind. The celluloid religion of holocaust (akin to the incarnation, crucifixion and resurrection narrative) and its hazardous anti-European undertones has been duly noted by many writers (including this one), but the Jew of the World pulls down our Western house in many more intellectually criminal ways than this. He uses his deft ability at conceptual distortion, Talmudic rhetorical sleight-of-hand and limitless chutzpah to literally peddle the death of Western civilization as liberation and freedom.
Racial Zionist Alan Dershowitz has the gall to blithely gloss over several thousand years of Jewry’s financial banditry, two Jewish-backed world wars resulting in the genocide of multimillions, crypto-Judaism, Zio-spy games and a general despoiling of all host societies when he informs his reader that “An Old Yiddish saying sums up the Jewish concern for justice: ‘Rather suffer an injustice than commit one.’ Gershon Cohen describes this unique preoccupation during the Talmudic age and throughout Jewish history as “obsessive concern of the Jew with justice and fair play.” Sorry, Dersh. Wrong answer. The Jew is concerned with “justice”. That much is correct. But peer beyond the smoke and mirrors and note that the concept of “justice” is unpacked at an ideological slant, situated in a fever swamp of rhetorical skews. It is a mish-mash of flimflam pettifogger platitudes pointed like a bullet poised to puncture the solidarity of the inferior Other. The Jew is mightily concerned with justice; this justice is Jewish through and through. It is Jewish in both its origin and its implementation. And it is unapologetically so.
Israel is a sad samsara state of Jewish justice. The Nuremberg trials were Jewish justice with an Old Testament book of Esther tinge of delight, an orgasmic relish in the spilling of German blood. The atom bomb is Jewish justice. Robert Oppenheimer, the creator of the bomb, wanted to use it on German civilians, but was content to kill their Japanese Axis compatriots as a second-rate, but still highly technological ritual murder. He soon lost all enthusiasm for his former “project of death” when the United States suggested that the A-Bomb might potentially be used on Communists, of which Oppenheimer was an agent. Suddenly he developed a “conscience”, which simply means that he decided to cloak Jewish interests beneath the gaudy guise of “freedom”, “liberty” and the “American way”. Later, when the Jews set upon the strategy of portraying the Soviet Union as “anti-Semitic” in order to cover up their principal role in the murder of 60 million white Russians, perhaps Oppenheimer might have been forgiven if he had stopped worrying and started learning to love the bomb again.
Jewish justice is simply a selective application of ancient laws. Of course, these laws were written by ancient segregationist Levite Jewish supremacists and would cease to exist if applied universally. Jewish justice is the double standard. Unbeknownst to Christian Jew-worshippers of every stripe, the Ten Commandments do not apply to non-Jews, least of all to the hated and maligned Christian taught to love all that is hampering him, thus vouchsafing only more future hampering and interference from the Jew of the World, who will never permit him peace or equilibrium.
Alan Dershowitz once stated that Jews should use any political power they accrue to “pursue justice.” They have done this. They continue to do this, and we are all the poorer for allowing the Jew to develop a “comfort zone” so big that it is allowed to crowd out the ambitions of European, and indeed all, mankind. This is a dual morality so big that it is crushing the planet, sweeping away diversity and the cultures of all races, ethnicities and nation-states. If contemporary demographics are any indication, this evolutionary strategy is slowly mixing the races into a summer-tan stew that possesses no identity and no allegiances that can pose a serious challenge to the consolidated flanks of activist Jews.
The Jew of the World is keen on these ideas. They make him feel comfortable, though never quite at home in his environment. But that’s not the important thing. What is most important is that the Jew is able to exorcise from his mind images of storm troopers breaking down his door and confiscating his media holdings and stock options. His ill-gotten gain must not change hands. For the internationalist, dual morality is a way of life. Dual morality is his only moral compass. It is the way of survival. It is the air he breathes and the only reason he is still alive to breathe it.
When all people finally behold the Jew of the World as he is, rather than through a media glass darkly, then we will be free. The albatross will be cut loose and all the phony ideas the tribalists have been selling will be rejected wholesale. The “light unto the nations” nomenclature will be revised in order to name things correctly. The flame of Jewry will not burn brightly. It will illumine us no more. Its flame will instead be turned back upon itself to burn away every malefactor that is desirous of our expiration. The anti-nationalist, anti-human ideology of Jewish supremacism will no longer inhibit our destiny. For the Jew of the World, the salad days are rapidly coming to a close. When this finally occurs, the only winners will be all of humanity.
Feminism is Key to the ‘Making of a Slave’.
When a reader tipped me to a talk delivered by a slave owner in 1712, entitled “The Making of a Slave,” I decided to compare past and present.
Past methods of enslavement were highly sophisticated, and closely resemble modern feminist social engineering.
Willie Lynch was a British slave owner in the West Indies. He was invited to the colony of Virginia in 1712 to teach his methods to slave owners there.
He advised slave owners to foster division, “fear, envy and distrust for control.” Pit young versus old, light skinned versus dark skinned and most importantly, male versus female.
In a section called “The Breaking Process of the African Woman,” he advocated shifting her dependency from the African male to the slave owner. This is achieved by beating and humiliating the male in front of the female. Then, beating the female if she doesn’t get the message. This instills a kind of frigidity.
“We reversed nature by burning and pulling a civilized nigger apart, and bull whipping the other to the point of death, all in her presence. By her being left alone, unprotected, with the male image destroyed, the ordeal caused her to move from her psychological dependent state to a frozen independent state. In this frozen psychological state of independence, she will raise her male and female offspring in reverse roles.”
“For fear of the young male’s life she will psychologically train him to be mentally weak and dependent, but physically strong. Because she has become psychologically independent, she will train her female offspring to be psychologically independent. What have you got? You’ve got the nigger woman out front and the nigger man behind and scared. This is a perfect situation of sound sleep and economic.”
She will teach her female offspring “to be like herself, independent and negotiable (…we negotiate her at will.)” She will raise her “nigger male offspring to be mentally dependent and weak, but physically strong, in other words body over mind.”
“We will mate and breed them and continue the cycle. This is good and sound and long range comprehensive planning.”
Sound familiar? We recognize these patterns in the US Black community, and, thanks to the hidden agenda of feminism, increasingly in the White.
AVOIDING SELF CORRECTION
“Willie Lynch” starts to sound like the Cabalist author of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”
“By reversing the positions of the male and female savages, we created an orbited cycle that turns on its own axis forever..” But “our experts” warned us of the danger that the mind might correct itself “if it can touch some substantial historical base.” They advised us to “shave off the brute’s mental history and create a multiplicity of phenomena of illusions, so that each illusion will twirl in its own orbit, sometimes similar to floating balls in a vacuum.”
I haven’t heard our society described better. Our collective identity (race, religion,nation and family) is being systematically erased and replaced by air. Lynch goes on to promote interracial breeding so the slaves are different shades of color befitting different levels of labor “and different values of illusion at each connecting level of labor.”
“Cross breeding niggers means taking so many drops of good white blood and putting them into as many nigger women as possible, varying the drops by the various tones that you want, and then letting them breed with each other until another cycle of color appears as you desire.”
In Orwellian fashion, Lynch concludes by stressing the importance of creating a new language befitting slavery. “We must completely annihilate the mother tongue of the new nigger…”
Again sounding like a Cabalist, he says, “language is a peculiar institution. It leads to the heart of a people. The more a foreigner knows about the language of a country the more he is able to move through all levels of that society. Therefore if the foreigner is an enemy, the country is vulnerable to attack or invasion of a foreign culture.”
For example, the slave should learn the term “hog pen” but never “house.”
CONCLUSION
Some people think this speech is apocryphal. The language has been modernized. Was the term “nigger” used in 1712?
However, Blacks seem to think the speech is genuine. It is on many Black websites.
The point is that we are being socially engineered to be slaves in much the same way as Blacks were, and by the very same people.
The modern female has been “frozen psychologically” and now depends on the slave owner (government, corporation) for her security. The modern male is emasculated, strong in body but not in mind, grateful to be allowed to serve a master, often a woman.
The Anarchist Manifesto
The Anarchist Manifesto
Most people do not consider the problem of government: it is not a person, nor a family, but a detached bureaucratic thing by which a few must rule over others they have not met. It does not consider the finer points of individual cases, but creates rigid abstract rules which inevitably come into conflict. For this reason, most governments spend their time in internal conflict over interpretation of rules, and inevitably oppress their citizens by forcing them to obey detailed regulations which fit an “average” citizen, yet apply to no actually living human being.
An anarchist is someone who agrees that civilization should exist, but believes that government is a parasite not necessary for civilization. Government both oppresses the citizens and takes from them the responsibility of making society work. Instead of taking it into their own hands, citizens are trained to sit back and call some distant acronymous agency to help them out. By this method, we domesticate ourselves and make even the best among us weak and passive. Even worse, we hand power to the bureaucrats, who are by definition people who could not succeed in actual work, and therefore take paper-pushing jobs so they have power over others.
The average person considers anarchy a state without order, but when looked at practically, it can be seen as a different kind of order. Centralized authority requires we all obey a single authority, but anarchy requires decentralized governments in which we are each our own authorities, and responsible to each other to collaborate and maintain what is needed for civilization. In centralized government, you have to convince a bureaucrat or jury that what you are doing is correct, but in decentralized government, you must maintain cooperation with your fellow citizens by showing them constantly that you are doing what is right. Centralized government is like watching television: you sit back and relax and pay attention to the show, but you are not actually part of it, and until it gets so bad you change the channel, you put up with its mediocrities.
Trust
Anarchists like to talk about “the n+1 problem.” This refers to the fact that, in any government, you have a division between citizens (sheep) and authorities (herders). However, the authorities are sheep as well, since they are also citizens and are not given by nature any greater wisdom or ability. Because centralized government requires passive citizens obeying its rules, and for that reason needs people to enforce those rules, it can be said that for every n citizens there must be a certain number of authority figures. Here is where it gets complicated: because these authority figures are also citizens, and thus we cannot assume that they either will obey all of the rules, government must watch itself, in order to be fair. Thus for every ncitizens, you need a certain number of watchers, and another number of watcher watchers. This adds up to the equation that for every n citizens you need at least n+1 watchers to keep society working fairly. Obviously, this is mathematically impossible.
What is missing here is trust. Trust, however, cannot occur when you have a society divided between people assumed to be doing wrong (citizens) and those assumed to be doing right (watchers). Furthermore, trust is nearly impossible when you have a government in Washington, D.C. which is trying to administer laws to places as different as Seattle, Washington and Mobile, Alabama. The only way one achieves trust is a society in which there is no division between citizens and watchers, and for that reason the responsibility to work well with one another is thrust back onto the citizens. When this happens, those who can trust each other exclude those who are irresponsible, forcing them to create their own social group to ensure their survival.
In an anarchist society, there is a lack of a single rule for all people, and therefore people cannot criticize actions simply because “they are illegal.” However, actions which are unpopular because they are destructive or selfish will cause the person who committed said actions to be exiled from the society of his or her peers, without protection of law for actions that are “legal” but not ethical. Local communities are the focus of anarchist society, because informal decentralized systems encourage people to form social units only of those that they know. Anarchist society does not rely on “enforcement,” or punishment of bad acts, but it relies on trust, or contined reinforcement of human relationships based on the day-to-day good that people do.
Morality
The moral construct of “good” and “evil” by which society lives is a materialist notion: it is designed to protect life and property, and does not consider the intent behind or results from an action, for example the necessity of driving away destructive people or confiscating property used to pollute rivers, as in the case of a dirty factory. Morality says simply yes or no depending on whether someone dies, or had their “rights” violated, or their property was taken away. Only secondarily do moral societies pass judgment over life and property, but by the very nature of morality, they are unwilling to do so on a large enough scale to have an impact. The death penalty is futile because a murderer stands good odds of beating it, and fining large corporations for their pollution is pointless because they will almost never pay anything commensurate to the actual damage done. Morality protects life and property, including of those who by virtue of possessing both will do untold damage to the citizens, the environment, and the public goodwill.
Anarchist morality is simple: do what you will. Those who are of like minds will congregate and form their own allegiances without formalizing them and thus detaching themselves from the task of building trust, and those who act in conflict with others will eventually find their will driven away or terminated by those who have a different agenda. This means that local communities will form according to the shared values of the individual wills involved; some communities will be dedicated to crime and drug use, and other communities will be intolerant of such choices and will defend against them. It is worth noting that no central government has ever solved the problem of crime, which is almost completely eliminated in local communities where everyone knows each other and have established a communal trust and values system, against which any transgression is clear and unwanted, whether it is “legal” or “moral” – or not. You cannot make enough rules to identify every destructive act, and those acts will differ from community to community.
Many people fear anarchy because they reason that, without some clear central authority saying right/wrong, people will act selfishly and destructively. The truth is that some people will always do that, and while they are protected under centralized authority, they are not in anarchies and therefore cannot get away with their legal and moral but unethical and destructive acts. Anarchy is not a revolt against morality, but as with government, a decentralization of it.
Anarchists Unite
One great misconception about anarchy is that it is entirely an individual process, since the individual defines the values and rules by which he or she lives. This is not the case, as anarchy is not an impulse against civilization, but toward a decentralized civilization because it is inherently superior in design. Anarchists collaborate in an informal basis because of the values they share, upon which they act.
Instead of having our lives be organized by distant abstractions and rigid rules, anarchists prefer to connect with real living experience: the trust bonds that form between individuals (who, unlike in centralized systems, actually know each other and interact on a daily basis) to create active communities of collaboration, instead of passive communities in which arbitrary laws are enforced upon us by a barely-trustworthy bureacratic entity known as “government.” If we want a world without the “abuse” of power, we have to recognize that power is abuse.
Some might construe anarchy as “radical” or “extremist,” but when one recognizes that civilization is a natural impulse and government only a temporary means of asserting “control” for the benefit of centralized organizations like government and big business, it is anarchy that becomes natural and bureaucratic government that reeks of artificiality and extremity. Not all people need to be constrained by the laws that limit the lowest among us; in the name of avoiding that pitfall, our society rules us all inequally, ineptly. Anarchy is freedom from that delusion and the future for all who value experience over rules.
PEJ News – PETA - Dan Paden -
When people find out that I’m an animal rights activist and a vegan, they invariably have questions. “Are your shoes leather?” they often ask. (Answer: “No.”) “Do you miss meat?” (“Not a bit.”) And, usually, “What’s wrong with eating dairy foods? Cows aren’t killed to make milk.”I hope that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals’ (PETA) new undercover investigation will put this last question to rest once and for all. Milk and cheese might seem harmless, but the dairy industry is responsible for often shocking cruelty to animals.
What Obama Isn’t Telling U.S. Workers :: PEJ News :: Stories, Features, Opinion and Analysis :: Peace, Earth & Justice News
What Obama Isn’t Telling American Workers
PEJ News- Shamus Cooke- A lot is happening in the tumultuous realm of global economics. The “Great Recession” has caused shifts internationally, with outcomes that will dramatically change the lives of millions of people in the U.S. and beyond. And while Obama is acknowledging this fact with repeated references to “a new world order,” he isn’t explaining how this adversely affects working-class Americans.
