Facebook Credits?

SOPA

SOPA

Corporate supporters of Senate 968 (PIPA) and HR 3261 (SOPA) demand the ability to take down any web site (including craigslist, Wikipedia, or Google) that hurts their profits — without prior judicial oversight or due process  – in the name of combating “online piracy.”

PIPA and SOPA authors and supporters insist they’d only go after foreign piracy sites, but Internet Engineers understand this is an attempt to impose “Big Brother” controls on our Internet, complete with DNS hijacking and censoring search results. Incredibly, many Congress Members favor this idea.

<RANT>Try to imagine jack-booted thugs throttling free speech, poisoning the Internet (greatest of American inventions, the very pillar of modern democracy), and devastating one of the our most successful industries. Totalitarian, anti-American, massively-job-killing nonsense.</RANT>

Tell Congress you OPPOSE Senate 968 “Protect IP Act” (PIPA) and H.R. 3261 “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA):

Supporters of PIPA and SOPA: RIAA, MPAA, News Corp, TimeWarner, Walmart, Nike, Tiffany, Chanel, Rolex, Sony, Juicy Couture, Ralph Lauren, VISA, Mastercard, Comcast, ABC, Dow Chemical, Monster Cable, Teamsters, Rupert MurdochLamar Smith (R-TX), John Conyers (D-MI)

Opponents of PIPA and SOPA: Google, Yahoo, Wikipedia, craigslist, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, eBay, AOL, Mozilla, Reddit, Tumblr, Etsy, Zynga, EFF, ACLU, Human Rights Watch, Darrell Issa (R-CA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Ron Paul (R-TX)

Where does your Member of Congress stand on PIPA and SOPA? (Project SOPA Opera)

PIPA and SOPA Are Too Dangerous To Revise, They Must Be Killed Entirely 

Congress needs to hear from you, or these dangerous bills will pass - they have tremendous lobbying dollars behind them, from corporations experts say are attempting to prop up outdated, anti-consumer business models at the expense of the very fabric of the Internet — recklessly unleashing a tsunami of take-down notices and litigation, and a Pandora’s jar of “chilling effects” and other unintended (or perhaps intended?) consequences.

Don’t believe it? Monster Cable has labeled craigslist a “rogue site,” earmarked for blacklisting and full-takedown under PIPA – resale of stereo cables by CL users reduces Monster ‘s new cable sales. (reddit).

There is still time to be heard. Congress is starting to backpedal on this job-killing, anti-American nonsense, and the Obama administration has weighed in against these bills as drafted, but SOPA/PIPA cannot be fixed or revised — they must be killed altogether.

Sen Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Rep Ron Wyden (D-OR) are championing an alternative to SOPA/PIPA called Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (OPEN) that addresses foreign sites dedicated to piracy, without disrupting basic Internet protocols, or threatening mainstream US sites like craigslist.

Tim O’Reilly, a publisher who is himself subject to piracy, asks whether piracy is even a problem, and whether there is even a legitimate need for any of these bills.

 

Learn more about SOPA, Protect IP (PIPA), and Internet Blacklisting:

 

occupy.net = Relentless Pursuit to Perfection!

OCCUPYNET

TooDamnEZ Welcome aboard our peaceful internetship.

Every now and then we expose a follower/subscriber when they catch our eye.    This time we have an interesting follower.     Enjoy your stay buddy!  lulz

 

 

TooDamnEZ

San Angelo, Texas

Richard O. Emanuel Jr., is an Information Technology Professional, Avid Blogger, and Veteran of The United States Air Force,. Mr. Emanuel is the Founder of “Reclaim America from The Lunatic Fringe!”a moderate political association, a member and former Secretary of The Association of Information Technology Professionals (Howard College), Fort Worth Campaign Strategy Examiner for Examiner.com, and the author of the upcoming publication “From Incarceration to Graduation”. He also authors and maintains 3 Blogs (Reclaim America from The Lunatic Fringe!{Politics}, The Diary of a Lost Soul{General Topics}, and The 1000 Yr Old Man{Technology}) He lives and works in the West Texas Area.

The Author may be contacted at:

RichardEmanuelJr@Gmail.com

On Twitter @TooDamnEZ or @RAfTLF

Personal Links

 

Link to this profile: http://gravatar.com/toodamnez

Never forget, all those that die for you. God Bless USA.

This might piss off some of us, but keep the good over all the evil in the end please.  Found this somewhere and it struct a few neurons and nerves so I reacted thus way (my comment at the end feel free to add yours):

Are You Proud Of America?

Are you proud of America?
I know this post will make people upset, but things are what they are, and the truth cannot be hidden.
The only way to ‘change’ things is to face the ugly truths.
-
Can you tell me what you are now proud of?
Are you proud of the fact that since Roe vs Wade, we have allowed over 40 million babies to be murdered in ‘abortion?’, which we call ‘choice’? That we have candidates that would want ‘state sponsored’ aborted babies?

Are you proud of the divorce rate in America? Our country has more divorce than any other country in this world.
Are you proud of ‘gay pride?’, ‘gay marriage?’ 2 men marrying each other, 2 women marrying each other, in the sight of God, forcing the abomination in our churches, and our churches cowering to this abomination, ditto with synagogues?
Are you proud that we have umpteen chapters of A.A., and N.A. to help our sick nation deal with drug addicted people and folks that cannot stop drinking? Are you proud that we have candidates that are for legalizing drugs to make the scenerio worse? Are you proud that our kids are more ‘turned on’ by drugs than having a little family, and dare I say, a little white house with a picket fence?
Are you proud of the fact that we are close to 16 trillion in debt? Are you proud that you voted Obama, who said he would lower the debt, only to lie to you and increase it?
Are you proud that women parade themselves around, have sex with any man ‘regardless of color or creed’ as to ruin the identity of people all together? Are you proud that your potential new wife has probably been to bed with 15-20 men before you? With all races, etc? Proud that she is probably not pure?
Are you proud of feminism and how it has destroyed the family? Are you proud that you are a woman that is feminist that can drag your new x husband to court and take everything he owns? Wreck his life, deny him his children? Are you proud that you have latch key kids?
Are you proud of the fact that everything we have here, is made in China? EVERYTHING.
Proud that we have traitors within that would rather learn about murderous dictators, feeling sorry for people that hate us, and overall.. are the drek of society? Are you proud that your next door neighbor is probably a Communist or a NAZI? A TRAITOR?
Are you proud that we have a bunch of illegals and 3rd worlders living here that have NO intention of learning our history. No intention of even learning our language, yet somehow think we owe them something? Are you proud of over 35k American deaths due to illegals from the S. Americas? Our borders wide open, because the govt refuses to control them?
Are you proud that we have a military that is a bossy Police force? A Military who is sent to bomb places for no reason, except we have insanity in the White House on a massive power trip? Our Constitution completely ignored?
I could go on and on.
************************************
When I hear of “American exceptionalism” I really want to blow a gasket. Just what in the hell are we exceptional with? Sure, the 1980′s we had “Star Wars”, but what recently?
-
You can be proud of our past, because that is all we have to ‘feel good about’. Our young kids treat elders like trash and mouth off to their grandparents, who paved the way, only for these young brats to shit all over them. I am proud of our older vets, and some younger ones. But the only thing I ever feel ‘exceptional’ about is our elderly and the world they had with inventions, moral and principle.
-
Look for America only in books, it no longer exists in any type greatness.
So, sing your songs and pretend to be proud, I am no more.

My Comment:

No offense.. but this is bias. Anyone with history logic knows the bias is against those labeled Goyim.

For the record,

Obama wanted change (so did most of his voters… …but not his major campaign contributors.  Much less do the nationalStructures contributors want anything to go the way the President really wanted things to go, their interest foreign and domestic is monopolized in a very complex labyrinth that has been exposed for a while now.  Welcome to 2012!), but the wannabe elite that have power… choose to feed their desires of foreign interest while sucking life blood out of USA, MY NATION, the greatest nation of the world where you and many come to suck blood on like vampires, while many die, starve and search for solutions. Falling for tons of labyrinth type mazes set up to disarray and mislead poor folks. lol i pitty the fools that think they can get away with such crimes via long term dedication and syndicacy. Anonymous syndicate hackers have united to bring your movement to its knees. enjoy 2012, the time for Great Awakening… face your reality, the games are over. AYBBTU

A victory on Keystone XL… and the fight continues. | CREDO

Take action!
Clicking here will automatically add your name to this petition to President Obama:
“Your rejection of Keystone XL was a victory for our country. The urgency of climate change demands more climate victories, very soon. Take the opportunity of the State of the Union Address to call for bold action to confront climate change.”
Automatically add your name:
Take action now!Learn more about this campaign

CREDO Action | more than a network, a movement.

A huge victory against Keystone XL… and the fight continues.

Dear Reader,

This is why activism matters.

Six months ago, the Obama Administration was set to approve one of the single most environmentally disastrous fossil fuel projects imaginable.

Today, it’s dead.

The Keystone XL pipeline — designed to bring filthy tar sands oil from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast of Texas so that oil companies can profit by selling the oil overseas — was dealt a severe setback yesterday when President Obama said no to an election year blackmail threat by the American Petroleum Institute and its lackeys in Congress.

But President Obama didn’t reject Keystone XL because he wanted to. Or because he thought it was the right thing to do. Or because he thought it would help his reelection campaign. He rejected it because you made him do it.

It’s a victory for activists. But because the President rejected the pipeline on a narrow technicality,1 in no way has he set down a clear marker against the pipeline or the carbon bomb that burning Canadian tar sands oil in China represents.

We want to thank the many groups and thousands of activists, who, following the inspiring call of Bill McKibben (Seems JIM is the man pulling this string?), joined us in putting massive public pressure on the President. In fact, CREDO waged the single largest activism campaign in our history.2

It was this pressure that forced President Obama to initially delay the decision in November. And it was this pressure, combined with the Republicans’ overzealous and irresponsible demand of a 60-day deadline that forced him yesterday to reject the pipeline permit.

Our pressure overcame the lies and propaganda of Republicans and oil giants, and their threats of “huge political consequences” if he didn’t approve it.

Rejecting this pipeline was the right thing to do. But by rejecting it purely on a technicality, there are many things President Obama did not do:

  • He did not close the door to this pipeline once and for all. In fact, he specifically opened the door to the southern portion of Keystone XL, which would allow this oil to be exported overseas — the real reason TransCanada wanted Keystone XL in the first place.
  • He did not explain the imperative of stopping not just this project, but others that will expedite disastrous warming. Just the opposite — he touted the need to expand oil and gas drilling and made no mention of clean energy.
  • He did not refute the lies of Republicans and polluters, whose biggest “jobs plan” is a foreign oil pipeline whose chief purpose is to export oil overseas.

The time to lead us away from dirty fuels and prevent escalating global catastrophes from climate change is here. And President Obama still can.

Tell President Obama: It’s time to lead on climate. Make the case in your State of the Union Address. Click here to automatically sign the petition.

Until President Obama makes a clear and compelling case to the American people for sweeping action to reduce our dependence on any and all fossil fuels, the pace of our transition will remain slower than what is required to stem the onrushing danger of climate pollution.

Until he refutes the false choice presented by Big Oil and Republicans — that we must choose between a clean energy future and a stable economy — he empowers and remains vulnerable to their attacks.

Until he shows his commitment to clean energy over dirty fossil fuels, the energy of progressive activists will be spent fighting individual bad decisions, instead of pushing to support needed progressive policies.

And ultimately, until President Obama takes the opportunity for a true moment of leadership that publicly raises the stakes on the fight to stabilize our climate, the State of our Union will remain deeply clouded.

Tell President Obama: It’s time to lead on climate. Make the case in your State of the Union Address.

Click below to automatically sign the petition:
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/keystone_sotu/o.pl?id=33678-3962516-Qib8Cmx&t=9

For now, it is clear that we must fight for every victory. It’s also clearer than ever that when we fight, we can win.

Let’s use this momentum to push for even broader victories to bring about the type of future that you and I know is still possible.

Thank you for being part of this historic victory.

Becky Bond, Political Director
CREDO Action from Working Assets Read more

The 2012 Republican Candidates on Marijuana | Marihuana | Cannabis | Hemp

As we approach the middle of January, Election 2012 is in full swing. Fresh off of the Iowa Caucuses, the six remaining Republican candidates move on to New Hampshire for their January 10th primary. As a non-profit organization, we are not permitted to endorse candidates for public office, but we hope this guide helps inform you of the marijuana policy positions of the various candidates.

(Note: I am not endorsing any of the candidates listed below and this is intended only as an educational overview of the candidates positions on marijuana policy.)

Republican Presidential Candidates 2012

Mitt Romney

Governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007)

Public Statements:

“People talk about medicinal marijuana, and, you know, you hear that story: People who are sick need medicinal marijuana. But marijuana is the entry drug for people trying to get kids hooked on drugs. I don’t want medicinal marijuana. There are synthetic forms of marijuana that are available for people who need it for prescription. Don’t open the doorway to medicinal marijuana.” 

(“Ask Mitt Anything” Event in Bedford, NH 2007 – source)

“We’ve got to not only continue our war on drugs from a police standpoint but also to market again to our young people about the perils of drugs.”

(New Hampshire Voter Event, August 17, 2011 – source)

“I believe marijuana should be illegal in this country. It is the pathway to drug usage by our society, which has made great scourges; it is one of the great causes of crime in our cities. I believe if we are at a state were, of course we are very concerned about people who are suffering in pain, and there are various means of providing pain management. And those who have had loved ones that have gone through an end of life with cancer know nature of real pain. I watched my wife’s mom and dad going through cancer treatments suffering a great deal of pain, but they didn’t have marijuana, and they didn’t need marijuana. Because there were other sources of pain management that worked as effectively.”

(Oct. 4 2007 at St. Anselm’s College, Manchester, NH – source)

“But having legalized [medical] marijuana is, in my view, an effort by a very committed few to try to get marijuana out in the public and ultimately legalize marijuana. They have a long way to go. We need less drugs in this society, not more drugs. I would oppose the legalization of marijuana in the country or legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes because pain management is available from other sources.”

(Oct. 4 2007 at St. Anselm’s College, Manchester, NH – source)

Prior Activity: None

Ron Paul

House of Representatives for Texas’ 22nd (1976-1977, 1979-1985, 1997-Present)

Public Statements:

“This war on drugs has been a detriment to personal liberty and it’s been a real abuse of liberty, Our prisons are full with people who have used drugs who should be treated as patients — and they’re non-violent. Someday we’re gonna awake and find out that the prohibition we are following right now with drugs is no more successful, maybe a lot less successful, than the prohibition of alcohol was in the ’20s.”

(Comments Post-Iowa Caucus, 01/04/12 – source)

“Well, removing [marijuana] from the jurisdiction of the federal government and allowing the states to regulate it, like they would alcohol. And this seems to be strange for a lot of people, but I’m only going back to 1937 when that’s the way it was handled. The states always did this, and I’m motivated strongly also because the states legalize it for the use of medicinal purposes and it is helpful to people who have cancer or are getting chemotherapy. So this is not a huge radical idea, it’s something that was legal for a long, long time. And the war against marijuana causes so much hardship and accomplishes nothing. So I would say that marijuana, as far as causing highway problems, is miniscule compared to alcohol, and yet we knew prohibition of alcohol was very bad. So this is just getting back to a sensible position on how we handle difficult problems. And, for me, it should be the states.”

(Kudlow Report, June 23, 2011 - source)

“The role of the federal government is to protect our liberties. That means they should protect our religious liberties to do what we want; our intellectual liberty, but it also should protect our right to do to our body what we want, you know, what we take into our bodies.”

(Jay Leno Show, Dec. 2011 – source)

Prior Activity:

Co-sponsored HR 2306: Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011

Sponsored HR 1831: Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2011

Rick Santorum

House of Representatives for Pennsylvania’s 18th District (1991-1995)

US Senator from Pennsylvania (1995-2007)

Public Statements:

“There is a difference between legitimate issues of character — someone’s behavior — and the issue of whether someone who has done something wrong in their life, now because of those mistakes, can’t talk about what is the right thing to do. Politicians who have stumbled personally, are capable of making values-based arguments. I don’t think that’s hypocritical. That’s a dangerous line that many folks tend to cross over — that because you made a mistake, you can’t talk about this or that issue. We all make mistakes.

For example, I smoked pot when I was in college. Does that mean that I can’t talk about drug use? Does that mean that I can’t talk about how that’s a bad thing? Of course not. You learn from those experiences.

Even during that time, I knew that what I was doing was wrong. But just because I failed, that does not mean that I shouldn’t be able to talk about it. That’s a different issue. It’s not hypocrisy, as long as you don’t say, ‘I thought it was right, and now think it was wrong.’ If you knew what was going on, and most people do, you have moments of weakness. It happens to all of us. But that should not deter people from talking about what they believe is right.”

(National Review, March 2011 – source)

“Well, yeah, I admitted you know, back when I was running for the Senate, that when I was in college that I smoked pot and that was something that I did when I was in college. It was something that I’m not proud of, but I did. And said it was something that I wish I hadn’t done. But I did and I admitted it. I would encourage people not to do so. It was not all it’s made up to be.”
(Piers Morgan Tonight, August 31st, 2011 – source)

“I would think that [legalizing marijuana] would be an activity that is not consistent with American values.”
(Ames Straw Poll, September 2011 – source)

“I am adamantly opposed to the legalization of marijuana and other illegal narcotics I believe that this would lead to increased drug usage, especially among young people. While it is true that many Americans blatantly defy federal laws against the trafficking, sale, and use of illegal drugs, I believe a greater number of people are deterred from illegal drug use by the threat of arrest and prosecution.”

(1998 Constituent Letter Supplied to NORML – source)

“I believe that the drugs which are currently illegal should remain illegal. I am committed to maintaining the federal government’s role in the “war on drugs”, which is fought on many fronts by federal agents, local law enforcement, substance abuse counselors, teachers, parents, and concerned citizens.”

(1998 Constituent Letter Supplied to NORML – source)

Prior Activity:

Voted ‘Yes’ on HR 3540 in 1996 to add an additional $53 million (raising the total to $213 million) to international narcotics control funding, and pay for it by taking $25 million from international operations funding and $28 million from development assistance.

Newt Gingrich

House of Representatives for Georgia’s 5th District (1979-1999)

House Minority Whip (1989-1995)

Speaker of the House (1995-1999)

Public Statements:

“I think Jefferson or George Washington would have rather strongly discouraged you from growing marijuana and their techniques with dealing with it would have been rather more violent than our current government.”

(New Hampshire Voter Event, January 2012 – source)

“I would continue current federal policy, largely because of the confusing signal that steps towards legalization sends to harder drugs…I think the California experience is that medical marijuana becomes a joke. It becomes marijuana for any use. You find local doctors who will prescribe it for anybody that walks in.”

(Yahoo! News Interview, November 28th, 2011 – source)

“I don’t have a comprehensive view. My general belief is that we ought to be much more aggressive about drug policy. And that we should recognize that the Mexican cartels are funded by Americans. In my mind it means having steeper economic penalties and it means having a willingness to do more drug testing.”

(Yahoo! News Interview, November 28th, 2011 - source)

“I think that we need to consider taking more explicit steps to make it expensive to be a drug user. It could be through testing before you get any kind of federal aid. Unemployment compensation, food stamps, you name it.

It has always struck me that if you’re serious about trying to stop drug use, then you need to find a way to have a fairly easy approach to it and you need to find a way to be pretty aggressive about insisting–I don’t think actually locking up users is a very good thing. I think finding ways to sanction them and to give them medical help and to get them to detox is a more logical long-term policy.”

(Yahoo! News Interview, November 28th, 2011 - source)

Prior Activity:
Introduced and Sponsored the Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 1996

Rick Perry

House of Representatives from Texas’ 64th District (1985-1991)

Lt. Governor of Texas (1999-2001)

Governor of Texas (2000-Present)

Public Statements:

“Crucial to understanding federalism in modern-day America is the concept of mobility, or “the ability to vote with your feet.” If you don’t support the death penalty and citizens packing a pistol, don’t come to Texas. If you don’t like medicinal marijuana and gay marriage, don’t move to California….”
(“Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America From Washington” by Rick Perry)

“When the federal government oversteps its authority, states should tell Washington they will not be complicit in enforcing laws with which they do not agree. Again, the best example is an issue I don’t even agree with—the partial legalization of marijuana. Californians clearly want some level of legalized marijuana, be it for medicinal use or otherwise. The federal government is telling them they cannot. But states are not bound to enforce federal law, and the federal government cannot commandeer state resources and require them to enforce it.”
(“Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America From Washington” by Rick Perry)

“[If] you want to go somewhere where you can smoke medicinal weed, then you ought to be able to do that.”

(Daily Show Interview, November 2010 – source)

“We can win the war on drugs but we have to fight it first. I know, I have to deal with this.”

(Republican Jewish Coalition 2012 Presidential Candidates Forum – source)

“The Governor does not support legalizing any drug. The Governor supports federal drug laws where appropriate. And while the Governor is personally opposed to legalizing the use of medical marijuana, if states want to allow doctor prescribed medical marijuana, it seems to him that under the 10th amendment, they have the right to do so.”

(Perry Spokesman Mike Miner to the Washington Post – source)

Prior Activity: None

Jon Huntsman

Governor of Utah (2005-2009)

US Ambassador to China (2009-2011)

Public Statements:

“Question: would you prosecute growers and sellers of marijuana in states where it has been made legal?

Jon Huntsman: I would let states decide that.”

(Townhall in Exeter, NH, June 2011 – source)

“I never saw him inhale.”

(Huntsman’s Childhood Friend in Politico – source)

Read more

A Timeline of the Top-Selling Christmas Gifts… Ever.

A year-by-year look back over the last eight decades at the must-have presents that sent parents a-tramplin’.

Let's Rock Elmo
Courtesy of Hasbro

2011: Let’s Rock Elmo (Hasbro)

The Big Deal: Elmo doesn’t just laugh his ass off like he did 15 years ago or babble incessantly like he did in 2008. This time, the character that never fails to captivate toy-market watchers (one of whom actually calls this “virtually the only exciting product” of the season) applies a more mature instinct: He’s a bona fide rock star, albeit a very polite one. Let’s Rock Elmo comes with a mic, tambourine, and drum set (anything more than percussion costs extra) and can launch into versions of “What I Like About You” and “It Takes Two.” There are a few frightening video demonstrations out there, if you must.

The Weird Part: That Elmo is back yet again. And that he pairs surprisingly well with a certain adult singer-songwriter.

Where to Buy It Today: Prices starting at $50 on Yahoo! Shopping

 

Apple iPad
Photo: Ben Running
More from Esquire:

Gifts Under $25 That Don’t Suck

Perfect Stocking-Stuffers for the Kids

2010: Apple iPad

The Big Deal: Really, were there any other contenders? It’s the first of its kind — a slim tablet that lets you seamlessly glide between movies, music, browsing the web, and Street Fighter beat-downs. With Wi-Fi and 3G, everything from racing simulators to magazines are just a touch away. And don’t get us started on that gorgeous LED display.

The Weird Part: You can use the iPad to do just about anything, but you’re probably going to waste all your time on Angry Birds, which has been purchased over 10 million times on Apple’s App Store.

Where to Buy It Today: Apple iPad Wi-Fi + 3G and iPad 2 available on Yahoo! Shopping at $499.

2007: iPod Touch (Apple)
Courtesy of Apple

2007: iPod Touch (Apple)

The Big Deal: The first touchscreen and Web-enabled iPod went from annual fanboy fantasy to national must-have, largely because it came at a fraction of the iPhone’s price tag. Christmas? There’s an app for that.

The Weird Part: Apple’s profits took a slight hit when they had to deal with a lawsuit filed by an irate mother claiming her child’s iPod Touch burst into flames while in his pocket, igniting his pants and “nylon/spandex underwear.”

Where to Buy it Today: Prices starting at $180 on Yahoo! Shopping

2006: Playstation 3 (Sony)
Courtesy of Sony

2006: Playstation 3 (Sony)

The Big Deal: Sony’s response to Microsoft’s Xbox 360had a North American launch inspiring such anticipation that pre-sale units hit $3,000 on eBay (retail topped out at $599), while mothers and mouth-breathers alike camped out for days to buy one in person.

The Weird Part: Legend has it one man on an advance line at a Walmart discovered there would not be any PS3s left by the time it was his chance to make a purchase. So he did the only logical thing: he treated people ahead of him in line to coffee spiked with laxatives. He got one.

Where to Buy it Today: Prices starting at $249.99 on Yahoo! Shopping

Xbox 360
Courtesy of Microsoft

2005: Xbox 360 (Microsoft)

The Big Deal: Beating Sony to the punch? Check. Internet connectivity for Halo tournaments stretching from nerds in Taiwan to schoolchildren in Toledo? You got it. Enough supply to meet holiday demand? Not so much. Frenzy ensued.

The Weird Part: Xbox 360 started production a mere sixty-nine days before its launch. Customers lucky or savvy enough to recognize the potential profits of Microsoft’sdilemma cashed in, as forty thousand units (or 10 percent of total supply) ended up on eBay within a week.

Where to Buy it Today: Prices starting at $207 on Yahoo! Shopping

2004: RoboSapiens (WowWee)
Courtesy of WowWee

2004: RoboSapiens (WowWee)

The Big Deal: What’s a RoboSapien, you ask? Why a remote-control, fourteen-inch-tall humanoid capable of performing sixty-seven preprogrammed actions and movements, including (but by no means limited to) break dancing, farting, and belching, of course!

The Weird Part: Prior to the resurgence of human movement with the success of Dancing with the Stars, humanity faced a sedentary period consisting entirely of RoboSapiens shaking their mechanical groove thangs onYouTube.

Where to Buy it Today: amazon.com

Bratz Dolls
Courtesy of MGA Entertainment

2001: Bratz (MGA Entertainment)

The Big Deal: Ah, Cloe, Jade, Sasha, and Yasmin. They’re the original quartet of ten-inch “teenagers distinguished by large heads and skinny bodies.” While their June 2001 launch proved disappointing, by Christmas they were well on their way to generating billions.

The Weird Part: If the Bratz remind you of Barbie dolls, you’re not the only one. Mattel won a $100 million copyright suit against MGA in 2008 (though it should be noted that Mattel requested $1.8 billion).

Where to Buy it Today: amazon.com

2000: Razor Scooters (Razor USA)
Courtesy of Razor

2000: Razor Scooters (Razor USA)

The Big Deal: This was the year we decided we didn’t want to drive… or walk. What to do? Dodge children in the streets! The original Razor also won Toy of the Year for establishing itself as a “classic mode of transportation, like bikes and skateboards.”

The Weird Part: Only downside? Any grown man on a scooter looks like a total zero. John Mayer celebrated this in a short film about his songwriting process.

Where to Buy it Today: toysrus.com

1998: Furby (Tiger Electronics)
Courtesy Tiger Electronics

1998: Furby (Tiger Electronics)

The Big Deal: Who wouldn’t want a furry robot that can talk and blink its eyes? Indeed, who wouldn’t want one so badly that they’d be willing to pay a huge markup? After retailing for $35, Furbies skyrocketed to $100 a pop, not to mention “collector’s items” like “tuxedo Furby” and “biker Furby.”

The Weird Part: Owners discovered Furbies were strikingly affected by magnets, inspiring a demonic-looking video craze.

Where to Buy it Today: ebay.com

Tamagotchi
Courtesy of Bandai

1997: Tamagotchi (Bandai)

The Big Deal: Housed in an egg-shaped computer, these digital pets required feeding and poo-cleaning, but the hard work paid off with the occasionally redeeming happiness monitor. Deeply creepy stuff, but apparently very popular: 70 million Tamagotchis have been sold to date.

The Weird Part: When a Tamagotchi “dies,” you can reset it and start again, but owners who truly cared for their pets found that heartless and instead had proper burials at (real) pet cemeteries, complete with gravesites and coffins.

Where to Buy it Today: ebay.com & Amazon.com

Beanie Babies
Courtesy of Ty Inc.

1995: Beanie Babies (Ty Inc.)

The Big Deal: First conquering Chicago and then spreading all over this plush nation, Legs the Frog, Squealer the Pig, Spot the Dog, Flash the Dolphin, Splash the Whale, Chocolate the Moose, Patti the Platypus, and dozens of other $5 bean-bag creatures with pun-tastic names devoured our hearts.

The Weird Part: Recognizing the willingness of Americans to abandon any shred of dignity to get what their children want, an Atlanta radio station dumped eggs and beans on people in exchange for free Beanie Babies.

Where to Buy it Today: bbtoystore.com

Barney
Courtesy of Playskool

1992: Barney Talking Doll (Playskool)

The Big Deal: Barney & Friends was aimed at a younger crowd that somehow found it irresistible to watch a man in a dinosaur suit sing some of the most mawkish songs ever. This talking doll brought the tunes all day long. Needless to say, parents were thrilled.

The Weird Part: Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers this show was not. From TV Guide’s “Worst 50 Shows of All Time”: “…his shows do not assist children… [T]he real danger from Barney is denial: the refusal to recognize the existence of unpleasant realities.”

Where to Buy it Today: ebay.com

1989: GameBoy (Nintendo)
Courtesy of Nintendo

1989: GameBoy (Nintendo)

The Big Deal: The first eight-bit handheld video game system to utilize cartridges, GameBoy went anywhere and didn’t force you to play the same game over and over again. Goodbye, couch! Hellooooo… other couch.

The Weird Part: Goodbye, Cold War! And thank you, USSR. A Soviet R&D center employed Alexey Pajitnov when he designed the puzzle game Tetris, which came bundled with the original GameBoy and to this day fills people of a certain age with an overwhelming desire to stack rectangles.

Where to Buy it Today: ebay.com

1985: Care Bears (American Greetings/Kenner)
Courtesy of American Greetings / Kenner

1985: Care Bears
(American Greetings/Kenner)

The Big Deal: The rare successful line of toys inspired by greeting cards — really — these plush teddy bears didn’t become a smash until their TV show offered children a glimpse of life in the Kingdom of Caring.

The Weird Part: There are few things weirder than the intro to the Care Bears cartoon. (Note: All viewers should know that the theme song may lodge itself deep in your brain and make you hate yourself for being so darned insufficiently caring. You’ve been warned.)

Where to Buy it Today: amazon.com

1984: The Transformers (Hasbro)
Courtesy of Hasbro

1984: The Transformers (Hasbro)

The Big Deal: Without them, we might never have discovered Megan Fox. Or how to turn plastic robots into cars, planes, tape recorders, insects, and dinosaurs. Transformative, indeed.

The Weird Part: Before this decade’s Michael Bay calamities, there was the 1986 animated movie featuring the vocal talents of Orson Welles, who shrewdly died eight months before the movie premiered.

Where to Buy it Today: hasbrotoyshop.com

1983: Cabbage Patch Kids (Caleco)
Courtesy of Caleco

1983: Cabbage Patch Kids (Caleco)

The Big Deal: Here’s how their Web site puts it: “One day, a young boy named Xavier Roberts wandered into a magic cabbage patch hidden behind a beautiful waterfall. He discovered busy little Bunnybees sprinkling cabbages with magic crystals. Suddenly, all sorts of different kids and babies peeked out of the cabbages!”

The Weird Part: Few toys have inspired this kind of stampede. While the shoving has died down over the years, CPK continue to go strong and are now one of America’s longest running doll lines.

Where to Buy it Today: amazon.com

1980: Rubik's Cube (Ideal Toys)
Courtesy of Ideal Toys

1980: Rubik’s Cube (Ideal Toys)

The Big Deal: ’Twas another Christmas delight from the other side of the Iron Curtain. A professor at Budapest’s Academy of Applied Arts and Design, Erno Rubik often built geometric models. One of them (a 27-piece cube) started being marketed in Hungary in 1977 and by 1980 was frustrating millions of Americans.

The Weird Part: It’s been said there’s one correct answer and “43 quintillion wrong ones” to this puzzle. So it was quite a feat when Northeastern University researchers found a way to solve it in 26 moves in 2007, instead of the 27 previously believed necessary.

Where to Buy it Today: rubiks.com

1959: Barbie
Courtesy of Mattel

1959: Barbie (Mattel)

The Big Deal: Good ideas are one thing, but it helps if you’re married to the co-founder of Mattel. Inspired by a doll she saw on a trip to Germany, Ruth Handler created Barbara Millicent Roberts. And with the help of ads aimed at kids instead of their parents, billions of dollars followed.

The Weird Part: Some say that Barbies lead to girls seeking unrealistic bodies, but researchers have calculated that if Barbie were an actual woman standing 5’6″, her figure would be an in no way implausible 39-21-33.

Where to Buy it Today: mattel.com

The Slinky
Courtesy of poof-slinky.com

1943: The Slinky (Poof-Slinky)

The Big Deal: While marine engineer Richard James was devising a spring to hold shipboard marine torsion meters steady, one fell from his desk and proceeded to spring end over end across the floor. When stairs also proved no obstacle, toys stores came calling.

The Weird Part: As if applications in the music, military, and space industries weren’t enough, James had to go and take a fan’s suggestion for the Slinky Dog in 1952. Hundreds of thousands of units later (including a 1995 Christmas craze based on the Toy Story character), and it’s still making the Chia Pet look bad.

Where to Buy it Today: poof-slinky.com

1936: Monopoly (Parker Brothers)
Courtesy of Parker Brothers

1936: Monopoly (Parker Brothers)

The Big Deal: Charles Darrow patented the real-estate adventure in 1935, and Hasbro claims that approximately 750 million people have partaken, making it the most played board game in the world — Guinness says so.

The Weird Part: Once and for all, the little guy with the monocle is not Mr. Monopoly; he is named Rich Uncle Pennybags. Let’s get it right, people.

Where to Buy it Today: hasbrotoyshop.com

Duncan Yo Yo
Courtesy of Duncan

1929: Yo-Yos (Duncan)

The Big Deal: After hotel bellhop Pedro Flores attracted a crowd playing a traditional Filipino game with an object on a string during his lunch break, he started the Flores Yo-Yo Company. (Incidentally, “yo-yo” means “come-come” or “come back.”)

The Weird Part: While the designed hasn’t changed — two equal-sized pieces connected by an axle to loop the string — marketers have built in a five-year cycle to make yo-yos popular again when kids forget about it. Because toys, no matter how classic, can always be forgotten.

Where to Buy it Today: yo-yo.com

More from Esquire:

Unforgettable Movies to Rent Over the Holidays

The Best Photos of 2011 

What Your Kids Really Want For Christmas

The Top Tech Gifts Under $100

Follow Yahoo! Shopping on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook

The Top Federal Corporate Sponsors (against legal cannabis)

rowse: Home /  / The Top Federal Corporate Sponsors (Who Don’t Want Marijuana Legalized)

Top Fed Corp Sponsors Want Marijuana Illegal

“for profit”.

By “Radical” Russ Belville on November 9, 2011

It still is “Of the People, By the People, For the People” where free speech is sacrosanct. The problem is that corporations are “people” and their money is “free speech”.

Mother Jones Magazine published last year an article detailing “Capitol Hill’s Top 75 Corporate Sponsors” based on their campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures in Washington DC from 1989-2010. I thought it might be interesting to review the list with an eye toward which ones could be pushing Washington hardest to hold the line on marijuana prohibition vs. which ones seek its end. Read more

George Bush Resume

THIS GEORGE BUSH resume was originally written and prepared by Kelley Kramer for Buzzflash and appears on their website as a BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY. When we found this we thought is was a brilliant concept and wondered why all candidates for President in 2004 wouldn’t just run against Bush based on his resume alone? If this can’t convince voters he isn’t fit or qualified or suited to hold any public office, what will? But we also felt, why stop here? Why not let everyone with good information add to this resume and help us continue to expand it even further? Surely, there must be lots more we could add to this resume if we put our collective minds to the task. So, if you have something you would like to add or even something to append with more detail, send it along for us to post. Please try to read the “original” resume. Then, if you have time, read what has already been added to this resume. Next, fill out our online form to submit your resume additions to us. If you want your name to appear beside your comments, you can add your name, city, and state. You can also add your email address in case you would like us to respond back or others to respond back to your input. All of these fields of course are optional. It is the policy of this site not to share this information with anyone, however, this does not guarantee that someone reading our site wouldn’t capture your email address if you choose to leave one online. Also, please read our disclaimers at the bottom before sending us material to use.

Feel free to email this resume to all of your friends. This project can really succeed if everyone pitches in to help! Read more

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.