Nancy Pelosi – California Marijuana LEGALization
As Speaker of the House, she also spearheaded the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 as part of the 100-Hour Plan. The Act raises the minimum wage in the United States and the territories of the Northern Marianas Islands and American Samoa. American Samoa was initially absent from the act, but as part of HR 2206 it was included. One Republican congressman who voted against the initial bill accused Pelosi of unethically benefiting Del Monte Foods (headquartered in her district) by the exclusion of the territory, where Del Monte’s StarKist Tuna brand is a major employer. Pelosi co-sponsored legislation that omitted American Samoa from a raise in the minimum wage as early as 1999, prior to Del Monte’s acquisition of StarKist Tuna in 2002. As of the 2002, 2004, and 2006 election cycles, Del Monte has not contributed to Democratic candidates.
Pelosi supports the Syria Accountability Act and Iran Freedom and Support Act. In a speech at the AIPAC 2005 annual conference, Pelosi said that “for too long, leaders from both parties haven’t done enough” to put pressure on Russia and China who are providing Iran with technological information on nuclear issues and missiles. “If evidence of participation by other nations in Iran’s nuclear program is discovered, I will insist that the Administration use, rather than ignore, the evidence in determining how the U.S. deals with that nation or nations on other issues.”
Waterboarding and CIA controversy
Pelosi officially opposes the interrogation technique of waterboarding. According to the CIA, while Pelosi was the ranking member of theHouse Intelligence Committee, she was told about enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding authorized for a captured terrorist, Abu Zubaydah. in one hour-long briefing in 2002. After the briefing, Pelosi said she “was assured by lawyers with the CIA and the Department of Justice that the methods were legal.” Two unnamed former Bush Administration officials say that the briefing was detailed and graphic, and at the time she didn’t raise substantial objections. One unnamed U.S. official present during the early briefings said, “In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to September 11 and people were still in a panic. But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, ‘We don’t care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect the American people.’ “